Follow MaxBotix:
Ask A Question
|     Written By: Scott Wielenberg     |     DatePosted: 11-21-2011     |
Sensor Noise Analysis Diagram

It's a little known fact that all of our MaxSonar products have been designed with a high acoustic noise tolerance. This means that the MaxSonar sensors from all of our product lines work to reduce or eliminate false detections caused by external noise sources. While acoustic noise tolerance is only a small part of our "sensor magic", that provides our users with reliable and stable range information, it is a critical factor for some of our users.

Recently, some of our users in the UAV community have been asking questions about the difference in noise tolerance between our LV‑MaxSonar‑EZ products and our XL‑MaxSonar-EZ/AE products. As a result, MaxBotix Inc., felt that it would be a good idea to provide our users with test data for each of our current sensors ability to reject acoustic noise sources.

Before Looking at the Data it is Important to Understand the Following:

First, decibels (dB) are reported on a log scale. If you are not familiar with decibels, an increase of 3dB equates to an increase to double the volume. The noise tolerance for our products fall between about 91dB and 106dB and this can seem foreign to many people. To make this report relative to human hearing, and keep things in perspective, a passing train at 30 meters is about 90dB, and a passing train at 1 meter is about 105dB. This means that both the LV and XL product lines have incredibly high acoustic noise tolerance since our noise tolerance falls within this dB range.

Second, all of our XL-MaxSonar-EZ/AE products are significantly more tolerant of acoustic noise than any of the LV-MaxSonar-EZ products, and this is shown in the data.

Lastly, sensors with a narrow beam pattern such as the EZ4 products offer greater noise tolerance than their EZ0 counterparts. As a general rule of thumb, you trade acoustic noise tolerance for the ability to detect small objects. (For example the MB1200-XL-MaxSonar-EZ0 is calibrated to detect a 0.25” (6.35 mm) diameter pole target at a distance of 3.6 meters, and the MB1240-XL-MaxSonar-EZ4 can detect this same 0.25" (6.35 mm) diameter pole target to about 1 meter.)

About the Noise Tolerance Data

The noise tolerance data shows the dB level where the noise began to affect the operation of the sensor. For this test, any noise level which caused 1 or more incorrect readings to occur out of 100 range readings was recorded.

The maximum distance to which the sensor will detect a standard target, a 9 cm (3.5 in) diameter dowel is provided for reference. This allows for easy comparison between the products for the ability of each sensor to detect small objects.

The extra acoustic noise tolerance of the XL series is readily apparent. Users who desire noise suppression along with extra sensitivity are encouraged to use the XL-MaxSonar-EZ/AE or the XL-MaxSonar-WR/WRC sensors.

LV-MaxSonar-EZ/AE Sensors Noise Tolerance Data

LV Noise Analysis Table

XL-MaxSonar-EZ/AE Sensors Noise Tolerance Data

XL Noise Analysis Table

XL-MaxSonar-WR/WRC Sensors Noise Tolerance Data

WR Noise Analysis Table

Notes About the Test

The noise threshold was set where acoustic noise caused one incorrect reading out of 100 range readings.

All of the sensors continued to function beyond the limits in the table, the data recorded is the point where sensors started to report false data. Provided the user does the appropriate noise filtering, such as a mode filter, (for a filter do not average data as this will just mix in the noisy readings), it may be possible to extend these noise tolerances.

How the Test Was Performed

MaxBotix Noise Tolerance Test

The test was designed to evaluate the real world use of the sensors, and to allow comparison between MaxBotix Inc., sensors.

A noise source was used that produced a pulsating acoustic source of 30KHz to 50KHz sweep at a 60Hz rate. This caused large spikes of noise within the sensor frequency band.

The acoustic noise source was placed about 50cm to the side of the sensor under test, with an output up to 120dB. This acoustic noise source was setup to direct the energy towards a large flat target, (which would then be reflected back to the sensor under test). A large flat target was placed 1.5 meters from the sensor. This target at 1.5 meters allowed the sensor to report 1.5 meters as a valid target.

The noise source output was increased until the noise just began to change the sensor output; the noise level was then decreased until no incorrect readings occurred, and this was recorded as the threshold.

 
Author: Scott Wielenberg  Date: 07-18-2016
Sensor is Tested When providing support, our technical support team may determine that further testing at our facility is the best way to help resolve the issue that you are facing. At this point, they will start the Return Merchandize Authorization (RMA) process. This article will explain what you can expect as your ultrasonic sensor travels through our RMA process.
Click here for full article.
Author: Scott Wielenberg  Date: 07-11-2016
Typical Wall Pipe Many customers have requested the option to mount an ultrasonic sensor in a pipe. During the testing and development cycle, we discovered a number of considerations and requirements that must be met for the application to be successful. When all of these are met, a user may be able to achieve the desired level of success for measuring the liquid level inside of a pipe.
Click here for full article.
Author: Jenney Grover  Date: 06-28-2016
one of the options for outputs On April 19th, we welcomed our supporters to join us for the Grand Opening of the Build Out. Bob and Nita Gross gave a tour of the build out and their vision for the space. We continue to be in awe of the support from our community, our employees, our distributors, and our customers. Thank you for the many years of support, and we look forward to serving you in the years to come.
Click here for full article.
Author: Jenney Grover  Date: 05-05-2016
5th Location: Current August 12, 2015, Inc. 5000 recognized MaxBotix Inc., with a rank of #3616 overall. Our growth from 2011 to 2014 was 87% with revenues at $2.5 million in 2014. Our 2015 year increased another $1.4 million reaching a total of $3.9 million. The three year growth rate for 2012 to 2015 is estimated at 212%. We could not have continued this growth rate without our valued customers. Customer satisfaction is our first priority. Click here for full article.
Author: Kathy Kostal  Date: 04-28-2016
Quickstart Setup Analog Voltage This article is a quick start guide that compiles information about sensor use. This is a compilation of eight (8) articles to help you through the process of selection, set-up, and troubleshooting.
Click here for full article.
 
 
 
 
 
Signup for notification of our exciting new products and periodic new letters. We are excited to provide the latest information from MaxBotix Inc.